Robert Crummey, University of California, Davis:
"The quality of the essays in the Architectures of Russian Identity collection is remarkable. A number of the authors are well-known specialists in the area and fully live up to their reputations. Despite the variety of topics, the book forms a coherent whole: several pairs and groupings of essays interconnect and reinforce each other in interesting ways, demonstrating the editors' ability to unite diverse themes and approaches in one volume."
Derek Offord, University of Bristol:
"This is a volume which engages with many popular scholarly concerns of recent times, for example the study of identity, nationalism, Orientalism, colonialism, memory, and the invention of tradition. It also illustrates very well the recent erosion of boundaries between academic disciplines in the humanities and social sciences. Surveying a period of over four hundred and fifty years, from the age of Ivan the Terrible to the post-Soviet era, the fourteen contributors approach subjects such as architecture, town planning, painting, and sculpture from a variety of perspectives, including the perspectives of intellectual history, literary history, and political science as well as architectural history and the history of art. In the process they persistently explore the contexts in which various artifacts, buildings, gardens, designs, literary works, representations of landscape, and monuments were produced and the meanings that they may yield.... The volume has a pleasing coherence. This merit is partly due to judicious editing and cross-referencing. However, it also stems from the consistency of the contributors' multidisciplinary approach and the recurrence of certain themes, notably the exploitation of buildings or other artifacts for political purposes and their function as a means of establishing, confirming or reformulating national identity. Moreover, the standard of scholarship (supported by plentiful black-and-white illustrations) is consistently high. Scholars working in this relatively unploughed territory are therefore likely to find the volume a useful source of reference and inspiration for many years to come."
Robert Bruegmann, University of Illinois at Chicago:
"Architectures of Russian Identity, 1500 to the Present, opens a window onto a vast and little-known world. From St. Petersburg to Tashkent, from the time of Ivan the Terrible to the period of rebuilding after the collapse of the Soviet regime, architecture has played a key role in debates about religion, politics, and society across the far-flung Russian territories. James Cracraft and Daniel Rowland have done an excellent job of illuminating, from a variety of disciplinary perspectives, the importance of design in any assessment of the rich and turbulent history that gave rise to such things as Boris Godunov's fortresses, the magnificent country estates in the time of Catherine the Great, and the carefully preserved churches and palaces of post-Soviet Russia."
Albert J. Schmidt, The George Washington University:
"For the most part this is a book about the many identities of Russia's built environment and the truths that unfold from them.... This is an important book; really the first of its kind, so far as this reviewer knows, to attempt interpreting Russian architectural history. Letting the artifacts speak for themselves is a splendid idea, one that could easily lend itself to other works of this type. These are scholarly essays, well documented and adequately illustrated."
Elizabeth Kridl Valkenier, Columbia University:
"This fascinating, highly rewarding book performs a pioneering role in our fast-growing studies of national identity formation. It adds the largely hitherto ignored element—architecture—in the creation of a self-image for the Russian state, its rules, and citizens.... This innovative and informative book is highly recommended, both for classroom instruction and individual enjoyment."
Janet Kennedy, Indiana University:
"Although architectural history intersects with other disciplines, for example, history, anthropology, sociology, and politics, those fields have not traditionally made architecture a primary concern. In recent years, all that has changed. The essays in Architectures of Russian Identity are by historians primarily, but linguistics, literature, geography, and political science are also represented. Despite the diverse academic disciplines of its contributors, the book is remarkably seamless in tone and methodology, perhaps because architecture has long been understood as an art particularly rich in social and historical symbolism."
