Barbara Newman, Northwestern University:
Why did Margery Kempe, an avid aural reader of books of consolation, eventually feel the need to write her own? Rebecca Krug supplies an answer by attending keenly to Kempe's emotional experience. As she searches for comfort in God and wrestles with shame, fear, loneliness, and despair, Kempe confronts 'the power of negative thinking’ so deeply entrenched in late medieval devotional culture but finds no writer as committed as she was to grappling with the lived experience of these emotions. Krug’s wise, compassionate study offers a fresh look at both the rhetorical structures of Kempe’s Book and the emotional community that undergirds it.
Claire M. Waters, University of California, Davis, author of Angels and Early Creatures: Preaching, Performance, and Gender in the Later Middle Ages:
This learned and fascinating book presents Margery Kempe as one who reworks her life into writing as a way to respond to the books of consolation that were both deeply formative and deeply troubling to her. In doing so she created 'the book she wished she could have read' and offered her readers an imaginative point of entry into the ongoing process of spiritual development, one that valued feeling and lived experience as much as the textual tradition. Rebecca Krug reads Kempe and her Book in the full context of scholarship on Continental as well as English devotion and offers a particularly compelling account of collaboration, one that is intuitively persuasive but that also drives its point home with specific quotations from Kempe's Book.
Nicholas Watson, Harvard University:
This balanced, and sympathetic account of The Book of Margery Kempe as a book of consolation will be essential reading for anyone studying or teaching the work, the history of women's writing, or the history of religious thought and feeling. Especially valuable are Rebecca Krug’s close attention to the neglected topic of Kempe’s literary style and her refusal to choose between approaching the Book as a biographical source and as a work of literature. This is a richly thought-provoking and original study of what remains an endlessly puzzling and fascinating work.
Katherine L. French, University of Michigan–Ann Arbor:
Rebecca Krug has written a deeply learned and humane book that situates Margery Kempe in the larger world of late medieval pious works of consolation. In Krug's reading of Kempe’s Book, however, Kempe is no mere imitator but a literate and engaged author who manipulates language and alters her writing process to see her way through despair, shame, fear, and loneliness. Kempe’s writing and revision process gives her community access to her own process of self-discovery and intense spiritual engagement. For medievalists interested in the world of late medieval piety, Margery Kempe and the Lonely Reader is an important and compelling reinterpretation of a challenging and often puzzling text.
Margery Kempe and the Lonely Reader is a pleasure to read, a fresh and compact study that wears its considerable learning lightly.
A rare and rewarding marriage of twenty-first-century scholarship and medieval text.... Rebecca Krug's empathic and learned study offers much to those of us engaged in studying or teaching the history of religious thought, or of women's writing, as well as those who simply wish to address their own feelings with a spiritual sister.
Krug writes humanely and with a generous interest in hearing and feeling Kempe, extending out this welcoming wish to her own audience. Some delightful transference occurs in this volume, for good reason and to good purpose, as Krug becomes a sort of avatar for Kempe, matching her as a companion, book for book—or, more humbly, by becoming her most recent scribe. Perhaps it's best to say that Margery Kempe and the Lonely Reader is the book that Krug wishes 'she had had all along' in her own studies (8). Now we all do.
Margery Kempe and the Lonely Reader will appeal to scholars interested in medieval devotional culture, women writers, subjectivity, feminist autobiography, and affect studies. It takes Krug's previous work on women readers and writers (Reading Families: Women's Literate Practice in Late Medieval England) in new directions through its immersive engagement with one woman's literate practice.... At the same time that she provides a learned and detailed account of Kempe's literate practice, Krug reflects upon her own experience of writing Margery Kempe and the Lonely Reader.