Skip to main content

Relational Liberalism

Democratic Co-Authorship in a Pluralistic World

  • Book
  • © 2023

Overview

  • Brings together political theory, epistemology and critical analysis in dealing with deep political disagreement
  • Defends a relational version of political liberalism that rests on the ideal of co-authorship
  • Sheds light on the epistemic dimension of political equality that has been mostly overlooked

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations (PPCE, volume 24)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (8 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

This book investigates the unresolved issue of democratic legitimacy in contexts of pervasive disagreement and contributes to this debate by defending a relational version of political liberalism that rests on the ideal of co-authorship. According to this proposal, democratic legitimacy depends upon establishing appropriate interactions among citizens who ought to ascribe to one another the status of putative practical and epistemic authorities. To support this relational reading of political liberalism, the book proposes a revised account of the civic virtue of reasonableness along with an investigation of the epistemic-specific dimension of political equality.

By engaging with political epistemology and social theory, this book explores ways to address inherent tensions within the liberal paradigm, using the following strategies of addressing these tensions: first, it defends a twofold model of legitimacy that distinguishes the goals, methodologies, and justificatory tasks of both ideal and nonideal phases of the two-level justificatory framework; second, it contends that democratic legitimacy requires an engaged and contextual critical appraisal of the injustices that characterize our daily social lives, illustrating how structural forms of injustice represent a profound betrayal of the liberal ideal of democratic legitimacy.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

    Federica Liveriero

About the author

Federica Liveriero is Assistant Professor of Political Philosophy at the University of Pavia. She received her Ph.D. in Political Theory from LUISS University (Rome) in 2013. She has held visiting positions at Boston College, at the University of California, San Diego, and at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell. She works on normative theories of justification and public reason; democratic theory; and political epistemology. Recent publications have appeared in Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Philosophy and Social Criticism, Social Epistemology, The Journal of Ethics. She published a monograph in Italian, Decisioni pubbliche e disaccordo (LUISS University Press, 2017), and she co-edited Democracy and Diversity (Routledge, 2018).


Bibliographic Information

Publish with us